We will use your email address only for sending you newsletters. Please see our Privacy Notice for details of your data protection rights.
Mr Sunak is widely expected to lower the UK’s commitment of spending 0.7 percent of national income on overseas aid to 0.5 percent in order to raise billions of pounds. So this website asked readers whether the UK cut the foreign aid in a bid to save money to cover the huge bill caused by the coronavirus pandemic?
A huge 97.6 percent, 20,715 of readers said Yes backing Mr Sunak’s decision due to be announced next Wednesday.
This is compared to just 2 percent, 437 of readers who voted Yes whilst 0.3 percent (78 people) said they Didn’t Know.
Expressing their views, one reader said: “It should be virtually eliminated except for a smaller humanitarian emergency only disaster response fund?
A second reader said: “Foreign aid is just a bribe to dishonest governments not to send their displaced the UK’s way and it is not working.”
A third stressed: “Foreign aid a total farce whilst part of our population depend on food banks and kids can’t afford school meals.
“Let’s get real and spend tax money on us, not on others where they have strong economies.”
A fourth person added: “Yes of course they should cut back on giving away our hard-earned money.
“Our people our economy and our country needs all the help we can get right now.
“Some of the countries that get our money actually do not need it they have their own wealth, some greater than ours.”
This view comes despite opposition from 185 development and humanitarian charity leaders including Save The Children, Greenpeace UK, and Unicef UK.
In a joint letter, they urged Boris Johnson to reserve the decision and stressed: “Now is not the time to renege on our promise to spend 0.7% of our gross national income on aid and development.
“Stepping back from our international commitments is not the solution and risks damaging the UK’s standing globally as we define our role in the world post-Brexit.
Rishi injects tens of billions of pounds into jobs to revive economy [REVEAL]
Universal Credit: Tax credit debt making claimants lose third of pay [INSIGHT]
HMRC stamp duty receipts rise 27% as lenders struggle with ‘backlog’ [LATEST]
“A U-turn on your manifesto commitment to maintain the 0.7% target would signal we are a nation willing to balance its books on the backs of the world’s most marginalised people, many of whom are dealing with the impact of COVID-19 on top of existing hardship.”
Former Prime Minister David Cameron, who oversaw the country first meeting the 0.7 percent target, in 2013, said abandoning the target would be a “moral, strategic and political mistake”.
Labour PM Tony Blair also said foreign aid had been a “great British soft power achievement” and that it had saved millions of lives in Africa by reducing deaths from malaria and HIV.
Sir Bob Geldof and Justin Welby are also among the critics of the Westminster decision.
Express.co.uk surveyed 21,330 people between 12pm on November 21st and 11am on November 22nd.
Source: Read Full Article